 |
| 
 |
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| International Star | 3078 | Warrington Wolves |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Apr 2015 | 10 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Jul 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
Or thane:I absolutely hate this, not Liam Knight as i'd be happy with him here, what i hate is that Burgess wasn't interested in the first place.He's knows him, has played with him, would have known he was available but wasn't interested, now he's playing really well Burgess is suddenly interested in poaching him. My confidence in Burgess has disintegrated very quickly, and he seems deluded and panicky with things he's doing. If we sign Him we should get rid of Musgrove and keep Vaughan. Byrne, Knight, Vaughan, Harrison, Yates, Philbin & Wood looks pretty solid, Crowther as back up possibly as well. Dan Russell i had a good feeling about, then saw him play and oh dear, not his fault but he's more championship level. We need 2 new good props minimum, and Either Play leyland or let him go. And just move on from Russell, and hopefully Lindop and Wrench both stay fit and keep developing. I like king, nothing fancy but is a workhorse centre and makes more yards and gets us on the front foot more than our props at times. And only costing 50k on the cap is a BIG plus, but the fact we haven't re-signed him already suggests he's on his way out. To be fair on Burgess didn't Knight only become available mid season when we had no quota spots left? Whether we should have filled that last spot with Russell is obviously the question we all know the answer to, its left our hands tied - maybe we would have been in a better position to bring Amone in if we had that flexibility of a free spot. Bringing in Russell certainly seems panic stations after losing Bateman & Nicholson, keeping our powder dry would have seemed the better option. King at £50k on the cap works well for his current contract, but I'm sure his next deal will be lower so the benefit is reduced, maybe having Walker / Ashton on £100k cap or Currie on £50k cap may work just as well. I'd keep King, but his salary has to be right and as you say Lindop should be considered first choice centre next year on his preferred side. Wrench I think at this stage can only be considered a back up given his injury issues of the past two years. |
|
Or thane:I absolutely hate this, not Liam Knight as i'd be happy with him here, what i hate is that Burgess wasn't interested in the first place.He's knows him, has played with him, would have known he was available but wasn't interested, now he's playing really well Burgess is suddenly interested in poaching him. My confidence in Burgess has disintegrated very quickly, and he seems deluded and panicky with things he's doing. If we sign Him we should get rid of Musgrove and keep Vaughan. Byrne, Knight, Vaughan, Harrison, Yates, Philbin & Wood looks pretty solid, Crowther as back up possibly as well. Dan Russell i had a good feeling about, then saw him play and oh dear, not his fault but he's more championship level. We need 2 new good props minimum, and Either Play leyland or let him go. And just move on from Russell, and hopefully Lindop and Wrench both stay fit and keep developing. I like king, nothing fancy but is a workhorse centre and makes more yards and gets us on the front foot more than our props at times. And only costing 50k on the cap is a BIG plus, but the fact we haven't re-signed him already suggests he's on his way out. To be fair on Burgess didn't Knight only become available mid season when we had no quota spots left? Whether we should have filled that last spot with Russell is obviously the question we all know the answer to, its left our hands tied - maybe we would have been in a better position to bring Amone in if we had that flexibility of a free spot. Bringing in Russell certainly seems panic stations after losing Bateman & Nicholson, keeping our powder dry would have seemed the better option. King at £50k on the cap works well for his current contract, but I'm sure his next deal will be lower so the benefit is reduced, maybe having Walker / Ashton on £100k cap or Currie on £50k cap may work just as well. I'd keep King, but his salary has to be right and as you say Lindop should be considered first choice centre next year on his preferred side. Wrench I think at this stage can only be considered a back up given his injury issues of the past two years. | |
|
| | |
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| International Star | 2476 | Warrington Wolves |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jan 2015 | 10 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Jul 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Velcro boots:
Little snippets iv heard, Willams is going at the end of the year writing is on the wall for that one. Tai is leaving, apparently we will be looking to bring in two new signings to replace. Fitzpatrick was pushing the Charnley deal through but a prominent figure in the club point blank refused and threatened to walk if he went over his head with it, no disrespect to Josh the individual is wanting our youth of the club to be used more.
If Tai is leaving, McDonald on a 2 year would be ideal, unless we are pushing Wrench to be a permanant Starter (not sure when Lindop will return?)Thank god someone took a stance on the Charnley deal and said no. Fitzpatrick and all else above should step aside with signings, i would say leave it to Burgess, but he's the one who signed Russell and didn't strengthen us, so my confidence in him isn't there. Will be interesting to see who we try to sign in the halves? | | | |
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| International Star | 3078 | Warrington Wolves |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Apr 2015 | 10 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Jul 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Velcro boots:
Little snippets iv heard, Willams is going at the end of the year writing is on the wall for that one. Tai is leaving, apparently we will be looking to bring in two new signings to replace. Fitzpatrick was pushing the Charnley deal through but a prominent figure in the club point blank refused and threatened to walk if he went over his head with it, no disrespect to Josh the individual is wanting our youth of the club to be used more.
Sounds like Chambers influence to me, bringing in Charnley would have meant less game time for Wrench & Thewlis Jnr - very much a backward step. | | |
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 5606 | Warrington Wolves |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Apr 2006 | 19 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Jul 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
If there is a 14 team format arriving next year with no relegation all we need to do is wait for our allocation of Aussie pensioners & persevere with progressing our young players to provide a great team for the future.
| | |
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 15764 | Warrington Wolves |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Apr 2010 | 15 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Jul 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
| | | |
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Club Coach | 2960 | Warrington Wolves |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Oct 2005 | 20 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Jul 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
Shame it will make no odds to us getting into the play-offs….even if sign all the Kangaroos. Also regarding Charnley - Abe said there was no truth in us even attempting to sign him so not sure that the KFP pursuit of him is true.
| | | |
| |
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
Copyright 1999 - 2025 RLFANS.COM
You must be 18+ to gamble, for more information and for help with gambling issues see https://www.begambleaware.org/.
Please Support RLFANS.COM
|
|
|
| POSTS | ONLINE | REGISTRATIONS | RECORD |
|---|
| 19.67M | 1,551 | 80,283 | 14,103 |
|
